Hashavas Aveidah – Returning Lost Objects

By

Rav Doniel Neustadt

The Basic Obligation

One who finds an object that has been lost[1] by a Jew is obligated to return it to its owner. If the finder picks up the item and then decides to keep it for himself, he transgresses two negative commandments and one positive one.

One may not ignore his obligation and simply walk away from the lost item. If he does so, he transgresses a negative commandment and a positive commandment.

Men and women are equally obligated in this mitzvah.[2]

The lost object must be worth more than a perutah[3] in order for the mitzvah to apply. If an odd glove, shoe, or rubber is found, one is still obligated to return it even though it is worthless by itself, since it has value to the owner who has its mate.[4]

There is no obligation to return an item—even if it is worth a perutah—if it is clearly insignificant and the owner does not care about it. Similarly, one need not return an item which has obviously been abandoned by its owner and is found lying in the street.[5]

Although the basic halachah does not require returning the item of a non-Jew (or even of a Jew who can be halachically classified as a rasha le’hachis, intentionally and deliberately wicked[6]), it is proper to do so in order to sanctify Hashem’s Name—kiddush Hashem. If failing to return the item may cause a desecration of Hashem’s Name, a chilul Hashem, the finder must return it.[7]

If one finds a lost object on Shabbos in an area where carrying is forbidden, he may not pick it up.[8] Even if it is found in an area where carrying is permitted but the item is muktzeh, many poskim[9] hold that one should not pick it up.[10]


[1] “Lost” means that it is clear that the owner dropped the item unknowingly. If it is evident, however, that the item was intentionally placed in a certain spot, the object may not be considered “lost” and it should be left in its place undisturbed. If, however, the item is found in an unsafe place, then we must assume that the owner forgot that he left it there intentionally, and we are now obligated to consider the item as if it was “lost”.

[2] Kiddushin 34a. See also Shitah Mekubetzes, Bava Metzia 30a, quoting the Rosh.

[3] C.M. 262:1. In 1980, Rav M. Feinstein (Hashovas Aveidah, Responsa 1) wrote that a perutah could be worth a nickel. Nowadays, one is not obligated to bother with a lost item worth less than a quarter (or perhaps even a dollar), since most people do not consider that to be anything of significance and would not bother with it.

[4] Rav M. Feinstein (Hashovas Aveidah, Responsa 4). Similarly, if a photograph is found it must be returned even though it is actually worth less than a perutah, since it is worth more than that to its owner; Mishpatei Ha’aveidah, pg. 71.

[5] Mishpatei Ha’aveidah, pg. 72-73, based on C.M. 359:1.

[6] C.M. 266:2. Nowadays, the vast majority of non-observant Jews do not fit into that category; Chazon Ish, Y.D. 2:28.

[7] C.M. 266:1.

[8] Beiur Halachah 266:13 (ד”ה אסור).

[9] Beiur Halachah 266:13 (ד”ה אסור), is undecided on this issue, but Shulchan Aruch Harav (Hilchos Metziah 40) and Chasam Sofer, O.C. 82 rule that absolute muktzeh, like money, may not be moved for the purpose of hashavas aveidah. Rav S.Z. Auerbach (Shemiras Shabbos Kehilchasah 20, note 29) argues that even limited muktzeh should not be moved, since returning a lost item is not considered “a permitted activity.”

[10] Kicking the muktzeh to a safe place, however, is permitted according to most poskim.

1000088483

Exemption From The Basic Obligation

The mitzvah of hashovas aveidah applies only as long as the owner of the item expects and hopes that the item will be found and returned. If, however, the owner has given up hope of recovering his loss and has written it off, the Torah does not obligate the finder to fulfill the mitzvah of hashovas aveidah. The halachah is as follows:

If the owner despaired of recovering his loss, the finder may keep the item. The halachah considers it as if the item has now become his, since the owner has forfeited his ownership once he despaired of ever recovering his loss.[1]

But this applies only if the owner despaired of recovering his loss before the item was found. If, however, the item was found before the owner realized he had lost it (and before he had a chance to give up hope of finding it), then the finder must return the item to its owner—even though the owner had subsequently despaired of recovering it.[2]

Thus one who finds an item and is in doubt about whether or not he must return it, should resolve three issues: 1) Is the owner aware that he lost the item? 2) Even if the owner is aware of his loss, how does the finder know if the owner has given up hope of recovery? 3) Even if the owner has despaired of recovery, how do we know when he despaired—before the item was found or after?

Chazal have formulated several rules to help resolve these questions:

1) If one finds an item which will be missed by its owner—either because of its weight or size (like a box or a bag), or because of its importance (like a wallet or loose cash)—we can assume that the owner is aware of his loss, since a person constantly checks his pockets to make sure that his belongings are safe.

2) In certain situations we can reasonably assume that, by the time the item was found, the owner had already despaired of recovering his loss. For example:

– An item is lost in an area where the majority of passersby are non-Jewish[3] or non-observant Jews.[4] We assume that in this situation, the owner will surely despair, since he presumes that the item will not be returned to him.[5]

– The item was lost in a Jewish area but it had no simanim (identifying marks) on it. No reasonable person can expect to recover such an item.

– The item had identifying marks on it but it was “lost to all”, e.g., it was swept away by a flowing river.[6]

In all such cases, the finder will have despaired of recovering his loss, once he is aware of his loss. Consequently, if the finder picked up the item after the owner gave up hope, he is no longer required to return it.

It is, however, proper to go beyond the strict requirements of the halachah and return any object to a person who offers proof of ownership—even if he has despaired of recovering it.[7] It is considered the “proper and right” thing to do.[8] A finder should be made aware of what is required of him according to the basic halachah, as well as the “proper and right” conduct which exceeds the demands of the basic halachah.[9]

As mentioned, all of these rules apply if the item was picked up after the owner despaired. If, however, the item was picked up before the owner despaired (e.g., the owner did not yet realize that he lost the item) the finder is obligated to return it to the owner. If it has no simanim and he cannot locate the owner, the finder should hold on to it until the owner shows up to claim his item.

Since often this is not practical, the finder may use the item (or sell or give it away), provided that he appraises the value of the item, and creates a record of all of the information about the finding, including the date and location of where it was found (a good suggestion is to take a digital picture of the item, add the necessary information, and keep it in a safe place). Should the owner turn up one day to claim his item, he would then need to return the item or pay its value.


[1] Most poskim hold that only an adult can give up hope of recovering the item, but a minor cannot; see Pischei Choshen, Aveidah, pg. 249-250 and Mishpatei Ha’aveidah, pg. 85 for a complete discussion.

[2] C.M. 262:3. The rationale can be explained in one of two ways: 1) Once an item is picked up by the finder, he becomes obligated to return it. The owner’s abandonment of hope of recovering the object can no longer release him from that obligation (Tosfos, Bava Kama 66a). 2) Once the item is picked up by the finder, he becomes obligated to guard it for the owner. The item is then considered as if it is really in the domain of the owner. One cannot be considered to be in the halachic category of having given up hope of finding an item when it is in his domain, even though he does not realize it (Ramban, Bava Metzia 26b).

[3] C.M. 259:3.

[4] Mishpatei Ha’aveidah, pg. 31.

[5]    An exception to this rule is when the lost item is a sefer, since we assume that even if a non-Jew found it, he would sell it to a Jew. The owner, therefore, does not give up hope of ever recovering his sefer; Rema, C.M. 259:3. A tallis, tefillin, and a mezuzah are considered like a sefer in regard to this halachah (Pischei Choshen, Aveidah, pg. 272).

[6]    C.M. 259:7. In this case, however, even if the item was found before the owner despaired, and even before the owner realized it was lost, the finder may still keep it; Bava Metzia 21b.

[7]    C.M. 259:5. However, one does not have to publicize his find; Shulchan Aruch Harav (Hilchos Metziah 18).

[8]    In certain cases, such as when the loser is poor and the finder is wealthy, a Jewish court can even “force” the finder to do the “right” thing and return such an item to its rightful owner, even though according to the basic halachah the item clearly belongs to the finder; Shach 259:3; Aruch Hashulchan 259:7.

[9] Mishpatei Ha’aveidah, pg. 35.

1000088484

What Are Identifying Marks?

As stated earlier, when there are no special characteristics by which the owner can prove that the lost object belonged to him, we assume that the owner has despaired of recovering his loss. The finder may then keep the item.

What are considered identifying marks?

– Unique markings on the object itself.

– Being able to identify the area in which the object was lost. If, however, many people put such objects in the same place, this is not considered a mark of identification.[1]

– The way the object was packaged or bound. If, however, many people package or tie such objects in the same manner, it is not considered a mark of identification.[2]

– The unique number of articles found.[3]

– The unique weight or measurements of the objects.

Coins or bills have no identifying marks in halachah. Even if the owner knows the serial numbers of the bills, or that his name is written on them, these are not considered valid proof of ownership since it is possible that the owner gave the coins or bills to someone else, and the other person lost them.[4]


[1] Rema, C.M. 262:9.

[2] Sma, C.M. 262:35.

[3] C.M. 262:3.

[4] C.M. 262:13; Igros Moshe, C.M. 4:45-3. Nevertheless, a talmid chacham who is well-known for his honesty may claim that he recognizes the money and that it belongs to him. The finder will then have to return the item to the claimant.

Screenshot 2024-06-17 120457

Frequently Asked Questions:

By

Rav Doniel Neustadt

I run a day camp, and at the end of every summer, I’m left with piles of items that were left behind. I send pictures home of all the forgotten items, plus call the ones with phone numbers written, but am still left with so many unclaimed items. What am I supposed to do with all of these?

The preferred manner of dealing with this common scenario is to place a sign in a prominent place (and/or email a copy to each parent) that all items left on the day camp grounds for more than a specific period of time, e.g., 30 days, are halachically considered ownerless (hefker). When the time period is over, you may keep those items for yourself, donate them, or discard them.

 

When walking through our bungalow colony, I always see items such as pacifiers, water bottles, sunscreen, and the like. Should I pick these items up and put them in a prominent place so the owners may find them more easily?

These type of items generally don’t have identifying marks (simanim), which means that the owner will likely be unable to identify the object as belonging to him and doesn’t expect to ever get it back. From a halachic perspective, he has forfeited his ownership and the finder may keep it (yiush).

But this only holds true if the item was found after the owner became aware that he lost the object and has therefore despaired of getting it back. If the finder picked up the item before the owner became aware of his loss, which means that he hasn’t yet despaired, then the finder may not keep the item, since it still belongs to the owner and must be returned to him.

Since it is sometimes difficult to determine when exactly the owner became aware of his loss, it’s advisable not to pick up the item but rather to just leave it where you found it, and hopefully the owner will find it on his own. If you already picked up the object, then you will need to hold on to it until you can locate the owner, which is likely not to take place until Eliyahu Hanavi comes and tells you who the owner is.

 

I returned a wallet to its owner and the fellow insisted on rewarding me. Do I lose the sechar of the mitzvah?

You certainly don’t lose the sechar of fulfilling the mitzvah, but it’s always preferable to do a mitzvah completely l’Sheim Shamayim, with no personal gain or reward.

 

I found a makeup bag and when I contacted the owner, she asked me if I could drop it off the next time I’m in her neighborhood. I feel pressured, because I’m not generally in that neighborhood, and I know I’m going to force myself to make a special trip now. 

You’re under no obligation to make a special trip to return the item you have found. Once you have notified her, it’s her responsibility to come and claim the lost object. If she fails to pick it up after being given a clear deadline, the item becomes hefker.

 

My five-year-old brought home a pair of glasses he found in a private shtender in our shul. He doesn’t remember exactly which seat, but I think it makes more sense to go back to shul and leave them there than keep them at home.

The glasses need to be kept and guarded at home, but you’re required to put up a sign or post on the shul or community chat group to let the owner know that his glasses (which are considered to be “stolen” since your child took them from the owner’s shtender) are in your possession. Once you determine the identity of the owner, you’re required to deliver the glasses to him.

 

I was the last one to disembark our El Al flight when I noticed a bag with a sefer left on a seat. There was no name, but I was concerned to leave it for the airline’s lost and found as it will probably never make its way to its owner like that.

If neither the bag nor the sefer has  simanim, you’re not obligated to pick up the lost objects. It’s best to leave it on the plane and let the airline lost and found take care of it.

 

I was at the pool with my kids and they found a watch at the bottom of the pool. The watch obviously doesn’t work anymore. Am I obligated to try to return it now?

A broken watch may also have some value, so if the item has a siman, then you would be obligated to try to return it. However, most watches don’t have simanim.

 

My son’s yeshivah dormitory has a policy that anything left in the dorm at the end of the zeman is automatically hefker. I label all my son’s items, and I asked the yeshivah if they could save things until the next zeman, so he could claim them when he realizes he didn’t bring them home, but they refused. Is this permitted? 

Any institution catering to the public has the right to make their own lost-and-found policy. If the policy is that any item left in the dorm is automatically hefker, then the policy will include even items that have clear identifying marks. They have a right to refuse your request.

 

My kids are constantly picking up anything they see on the sidewalk and then are excited to do hashavas aveidah, but I have no way of knowing how to return any of these things. Still, I don’t want to discourage them from doing a mitzvah.

They need to be taught that every mitzvah has halachos and guidelines that need to be followed, and we don’t just do mitzvos because we feel like doing them or they make us feel good, but only because they are Hashem’s commandments that have to be followed according to the Shulchan Aruch. Doing a mitzvah without following the rules is like not doing the mitzvah at all, and this, too, is what chinuch is all about.

 

I have a lot of keys piled up in my home that we’ve found over time. Since a key is specific to a certain lock, is that called a siman, or may I get rid of them?

Since there is no way to know which key fits which lock, that isn’t considered a siman. But you may only get rid of them if you can determine that the keys were found after the owner realized he lost them. If the keys were found and picked up before the owner realized they were lost, you may not just simply get rid of the keys.

 

I found a cell phone a while ago and tried many times to contact the owner without success. I’m still hoping to track him down, but I now need an extra phone while mine is in for repairs. May I use this one?

Since you’ve identified the owner of the phone, but you haven’t yet been successful in reaching him, this is considered a lost object that has a siman. The halachah is that it’s forbidden for the finder to use the found item for his own benefit, even if you’re positive that the owner would gladly let you use it for your needs.